Food and disease – what is the weakest link
Early origins of diseases
Scientists are exploring links between what we eat, the way we live and effect of our environment on some of the diseases we suffer. These effects of environment have been traced right from before our conception through our life course and increases our risk of suffering certain diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and certain cancers.
In this presentation, Prof. Paul Haggarty, from Rowlett Institute of Nutrition and Health at the University of Aberdeen explains further:
A along and healthy life. Most of us want that and we have a good idea of the things we need to do to achieve it - eat a good diet, don't put on too much weight, and avoid smoking. But there is an emerging area of research that suggest that events even before birth may be influencing our health and wellbeing throughout life, from obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, to cognitive function. Interest in this possibility started when researchers looking at historical birth records noticed that the risk of some diseases in later life were related to birth weight decades earlier. These observations led researchers in Southampton to suggest that the mother's nutrition in pregnancy could impact on the health of their offspring. Subsequent research suggests that the period of sensitivity may extend beyond pregnancy into breastfeeding and back even before fertilisation. Birth weight has been linked to the risk of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease, and a number of other health outcomes in adult life, and even intelligence. These statistical associations suggest that a fundamental biological phenomenon may be linking something in the early environment to later health. Someone suggested that the cause could be factors like stress in the mothers during pregnancy. But most interest is focused on mother's nutrition and specific studies have been carried out on the effects of mother's consumption of nutrients such as polyunsaturated fatty acids, folic acid, and others. However, researchers are only beginning to understand how this process works. A particular challenge has been how to explain the delay of decades between those early life influences and the chronic diseases that they appear to give rise to in later life. In recent years, a new understanding of the biology of the human genome has emerged that can help explain this time delay and the transgenerational transmission of health and disease risk from parents to children. That new idea is something called epigenetics. The word comes from the Greek "epi," which means upon or over. And it refers to information in the human genome over and above the normal genetic information. This provides a mechanism by which our genome may be modifiable by the environment on our experiences throughout life. Epigenetic changes can accumulate over our lifetime and may explain how the environment before birth and even the environment experienced by our parents before they were born can affect our health. We know that one of the most important ways in which the environment can affect our DNA through this epigenetic process is by something called methylation. Developments in technology mean that we can now measure these changes very accurately. In this process, the DNA is modified in a way that changes the function of the human genome. It alters the genes that are switched on and off, and ultimately, it influences our biology. We now know that a wide range of nutrients can change these epigenetic states in ways that can impact our health and it could also be influenced by factors such as social status, infertility treatment, and even the emotional environment. This emerging understanding also helps to explain how completely different aspects of life, from diet to physical activity, to emotional health, and our ability to cope with stress, can interact at the fundamental level of the genome. Epigenetic marks are known to change over the life course. And this trajectory has been linked to longevity. Well, particular patterns have been linked to specific diseases such as cancer. The concept is these changes accumulate until they reach a stage where they tip the genome into an unhealthy state. And that when enough of these transitions occur, it can give rise to disease. New insights emerging from this field are already changing the way we look at health. When it comes to things like pregnancy advice, it's usually assumed that this is all the mum's responsibility. She's the one that has to eat well, avoid alcohol, and smoking, and keep to a healthy weight. But this new concept of epigenetics brings dad into the frame too. We've known for a long time that the age of the father can affect the health in the offspring, particularly in relation to psychiatric illnesses like schizophrenia. And we now understand that the father's diet and lifestyle can influence the epigenetic marks in the sperm that provide half the genetic makeup of the offspring. So maybe it's time for dads to look after their health too for the sake of baby. This emerging field of epigenetics shows us that what happens before birth can influence the way the human genome works through the rest of our life, with potentially important consequences for our health and wellbeing. We're only now beginning to understand that how we live may influence the health of our children and grandchildren. The hope is that this new understanding will help us to develop effective strategies to improve the life chances for all babies in the future.
Source: Future learn
A non governmental organization for maternal and child health care and public development
Thursday, 22 September 2016
Thursday, 8 September 2016
Breastfeeding: Nutritionist advises employers to provide crèches
A nutritionist, Prof. Ignatius Onimawo, has advised employers to provide crèches in their work places to support nursing mothers to practise exclusive breastfeeding for six months.
Onimawo, the Vice Chancellor of Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo state, gave the advice in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja on Wednesday.
He said employers should look at the international policy on crèches and implement same in the country.
“The international policy says any employer that has more than 50 people should provide a crèche where a woman can always take care of the child and breastfeed him or her on demand.
“All these come to play if we want to improve breastfeeding rate in the country,’’ the expert said.
Onimawo, who is also a former President of the Nutrition Society of Nigeria, said awareness on breastfeeding was not enough in the country.
He advised medical workers to educate nursing mothers on the need to embrace exclusive breastfeeding for their babies.
“Some nursing mothers give excuse that they are career women but that should not be an excuse for not breastfeeding because there are ways of doing it.
“Breast milk can be expressed even if it is not stored in the fridge; it is healthy, so people need to know that breast milk can be expressed while the mother is at work.
“Mothers need to know that breast milk contains more than 80 per cent water. The child doesn’t need water while being breastfed,’’ he said.
Onimawo said there were a lot of advantages of practising exclusive breastfeeding for the baby and the mother.
“Exclusive breastfeeding will make the child to be healthy and he or she will be more intelligent.
“ The mother of the child will visit clinic less because the health of the mother will improve and the mother is not likely to develop loop that can lead to breast cancer.
“So, there are so many advantages and when the mother knows about this; on her own, she will begin to practise it,’’ he said.
In addition, Onimawo urged Nigerians to eat balanced diet.
“Our diets are heavily carbohydrate and too much of it is not good for human nutrition.
“We should include vegetables and fruits in our diets to increase our nutrients,’’ he said.
Source: The Nation Newspaper
Appeal for Nigeria
GPEI appeals for support to respond to a polio outbreak in north-eastern Nigeria as part of the broader humanitarian response effort

© WHO Nigeria
Nigeria & Lake Chad Polio Outbreak Appeal
Nigeria has been experiencing insurgency in the north-eastern part of the country since 2009 which led the Nigerian President to declare the state of emergency in the 3 worst affected states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states in May 2014.
Nigeria has been experiencing insurgency in the north-eastern part of the country since 2009 which led the Nigerian President to declare the state of emergency in the 3 worst affected states of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa states in May 2014.
The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) aims to deliver polio vaccine alongside broader life-saving health interventions to some of the most marginalized populations globally in order to fulfil the goals of the Endgame plan. As part of the humanitarian response to the current crisis in Nigeria, a holistic approach to tackling polio underpins the current outbreak response efforts.
A deteriorating humanitarian situation
Against a backdrop of long-term crisis, the humanitarian situation in northern Nigeria has worsened substantially in recent weeks. Over seven million people are in urgent need of humanitarian assistance across the country, with limited access to basic health and other essential services, with the main areas impacted by the crisis situated in the north-east. Access to health services has been drastically compromised, with half of the population not having access to any basic health services. As a result on-going public health risks are very high, with low baseline vaccination coverage rates, populations housed in overcrowded and unsanitary camps and severe food insecurity. The crisis also has broader regional implications, with approximately 155,000 refugees in Chad, Cameroon and Niger.
Challenges to polio eradication
This difficult situation was made more complicated by the detection in August in Borno of two new cases of polio - the first cases detected in Africa since 2014. As many as 600,000 children across north eastern Nigeria remain inaccessible to polio vaccinators, presenting a very real obstacle to polio eradication efforts. Concrete strategies are in place to tackle such obstacles, including through close collaboration with key community stakeholders. Similar approaches have been used by the GPEI in other parts of the world beset by complex humanitarian emergencies or insecurity. Most recently in the Middle East, the polio outbreak response was conducted within the broader humanitarian response effort, to ensure that as communities are reached, they are not just reached with polio vaccine but with a host of other lifesaving health interventions.
An effective outbreak response
Following the recent cases of polio in Nigeria, a major vaccination campaign in Nigeria and the surrounding region has been launched in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and UNICEF, with subsequent rounds to follow. Vaccination efforts form part of the broader response to the current humanitarian crisis in Borno and the surrounding states, and across the Lake Chad basin countries. The focus is on coordinating the delivery of basic health services including vaccinations, enhancing surveillance for epidemic-prone diseases, providing life-saving interventions to manage common ailments among children, adult and the elderly, improving maternal and child health services at the community and facility level including mentoring of health workers, conducting ongoing evaluations of the evolving situation, and improving readiness response for any new disease outbreaks. The GPEI is committed to integrating within a broader humanitarian framework in order to secure a polio-free world.
Source: Global Polio Eradication Initiative
Monday, 5 September 2016
Tetanus shots: Is it risky to receive 'extra' boosters?
What happens if you get tetanus shots too close together — within a few years instead of the recommended 10 years?
Answers from James M. Steckelberg, M.D.
It's usually OK to receive an extra booster of the tetanus vaccine. This is especially true if you're being treated for an acute injury, such as a deep cut or puncture wound.
Vaccination is the best way to prevent tetanus — a serious disease caused by a bacterial toxin that affects the nervous system. Tetanus bacterial spores can enter your body through any cut or scratch. But deep puncture wounds, such as from stepping on a nail, are most susceptible to tetanus infection.
An adult who's never been immunized against tetanus should complete the initial tetanus series of three tetanus shots. The first two shots are given at least four weeks apart, and the third shot is given six to 12 months after the second shot. After the initial tetanus series, booster shots are recommended every 10 years.
If you experience a puncture wound, it's best to get the booster shot regardless of when you had your last tetanus shot.
Source: Mayo Clinic
Wednesday, 31 August 2016
Oral polio vaccine (OPV)
The oral polio vaccine (OPV) was developed in 1961 by Albert Sabin. Also called “trivalent oral polio vaccine” or “Sabin vaccine”, OPV consists of a mixture of live, attenuated (weakened) poliovirus strains of all three poliovirus types.
OPV produces antibodies in the blood to all three types of poliovirus. In the event of infection, these antibodies protect against paralysis by preventing the spread of wild poliovirus to the nervous system.
OPV also produces a local, mucosal immune response in the mucous membrane of the intestines. In the event of infection, these mucosal antibodies limit the replication of the wild poliovirus inside the intestine. This intestinal immune response to OPV is thought to be the main reason why mass campaigns with OPV can rapidly stop person-to-person transmission of wild poliovirus.
OPV also produces a local, mucosal immune response in the mucous membrane of the intestines. In the event of infection, these mucosal antibodies limit the replication of the wild poliovirus inside the intestine. This intestinal immune response to OPV is thought to be the main reason why mass campaigns with OPV can rapidly stop person-to-person transmission of wild poliovirus.
Advantages
- OPV is administered orally. It can be given by volunteers and does not require trained health workers or sterile injection equipment.
- The vaccine is relatively inexpensive. In 2011, the cost of a single dose for public health programmes in developing countries was between 11 and 14 US cents.
- OPV is safe, effective, and induces long-lasting immunity to all three types of poliovirus.
- For several weeks after vaccination, the vaccine virus replicates in the intestine, is excreted in the faeces, and can be spread to others in close contact. This means that in areas where hygiene and sanitation are poor, immunization with OPV can result in the “passive” immunization of people who have not been directly vaccinated.
Disadvantages
Although OPV is safe and effective, in extremely rare cases (approx. 1 in every 2.7 million first doses of the vaccine) the live attenuated vaccine virus in OPV can cause paralysis. In some cases it is believed that this vaccine-associated paralytic polio (VAPP) may be triggered by immune deficiency.
The extremely low risk of VAPP is well known and accepted by most public health programmes in the world because without OPV, hundreds of thousands of children would be crippled every year.
A second disadvantage is that very rarely the virus in the vaccine may genetically change and start to circulate among a population. These viruses are known as circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV).
The extremely low risk of VAPP is well known and accepted by most public health programmes in the world because without OPV, hundreds of thousands of children would be crippled every year.
A second disadvantage is that very rarely the virus in the vaccine may genetically change and start to circulate among a population. These viruses are known as circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses (cVDPV).
Safety
OPV is an extremely safe vaccine. All OPV used in supplementary immunization activities for the Global Polio Eradication Initiative is pre-qualified by WHO and procured through UNICEF. In 2006, WHO issued a statement to affirm the quality and safety of OPV.
Efficacy
OPV is highly effective against all three types of wild poliovirus. When this vaccine is used however, there is competition among the three viruses to cause immunity, which results in protection but not with equal efficiency for each type: it is most effective against type 2.
One dose of OPV produces immunity to all three poliovirus serotypes in approximately 50% of recipients. Three doses produce immunity in more than 95% of recipients. Immunity is long-lasting and probably life-long.
One dose of OPV produces immunity to all three poliovirus serotypes in approximately 50% of recipients. Three doses produce immunity in more than 95% of recipients. Immunity is long-lasting and probably life-long.
Recommended use
In most countries, OPV remains the vaccine of choice in routine immunization schedules and supplementary immunization activities.
Where more than one type of wild poliovirus is circulating, OPV is epidemiologically and operationally the best vaccine to use because protection develops to each of the three types of polio virus.
Where more than one type of wild poliovirus is circulating, OPV is epidemiologically and operationally the best vaccine to use because protection develops to each of the three types of polio virus.
HIGH INFANT MORTALITY RATE IN NIGERIA
UNICEF’s Chief of Field Office in charge of Katsina and Kano States, Padmavathi Yedla, has explained that the solutions to high infant mortality rate in Nigeria are not expensive but they are not properly observed because social norms are opposed to them.
Yedla, who stated this at the weekend while speaking at her maiden meeting with Katsina newsmen, was disturbed by the high rate of infant mortality, particularly in the North.
She expressed that even in the North with the highest rate of infant mortality; many women do not practice exclusive breast feeding.
“The reason they give is that their mothers – in – law or their mothers say when a child is not given water, the child will not be healthy. What happens is that the water they often give to the children is not pure; it is already contaminated.”
Yedla said another major reason for high infant mortality is malnutrition, saying “if you look at the cycle of malnutrition, many children (girls) are married at the age when they are not completely ready for marriage and these girls themselves are very malnourished; they are not very healthy by the time they get married.”
According to her, a child born to a malnourished mother doesn’t have adequate resistance against ailment caused by bacteria contamination.
“So, the solutions are there but the social norms prevent us because we believe that a child needs more than breast milk. That’s not true. The child’s stomach is very small and when the child is given water, the child’s stomach is filled up but water does not contain any nutrient.”
She also said it is unfortunate that lack of access to safe water and sanitation procedures remain the major source of diarrhea; a one of the killer diseases of children who are under five years.
She was confident that the proactive role of media on immunisation and malnutrition among others would no doubt improve the health condition of the populace at the grassroots.
By: Andy Asemota
Leadership News
Leadership News
Wednesday, 17 August 2016
Polio Eradication End Game and Certification Programme
These activities were part of the training workshop on polio eradication organized by FCT health administration in collaboration with WHO for Guild of Medical Director (GMD) and private health sector practitioners.
This was held in response to the recent outbreak of polio in North East Nigeria. The training dwelt on how to tackle polio and contain its further spread. Issues on urgent large-scale immunization of the affected areas and effective surveillance measures to detect any threat of further spread were discussed.
This was held in response to the recent outbreak of polio in North East Nigeria. The training dwelt on how to tackle polio and contain its further spread. Issues on urgent large-scale immunization of the affected areas and effective surveillance measures to detect any threat of further spread were discussed.
Case was also made for sustained efforts at checking reemergence of other communicable diseases that have largely been controlled/eradicated, such as measles, neonatal tetanus, yellow fever, cholera, meningitis, guinea worm disease and Ebola virus disease.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

